16. Primary Research (General Questions Analysis)

Introduction:

Procedural programming is a way of writing computer programs by following a step-by-step approach. To learn about people's awareness and opinions on Procedural Programming, we conducted a survey with 15 participants. This article analyzes the data we collected to give insights into what people know, think, and prefer when it comes to Procedural Programming.

Knowing about Procedural Programming:

We started by asking the participants if they knew what Procedural Programming is. Out of the group, 60% said they knew, while the other 40% said they didn't. This shows that a good number of participants are familiar with Procedural Programming, but some are not.

Opinions on Usefulness:

Next, we asked the participants if they think Procedural Programming is useful. Most of them, 70%, agreed that it is helpful for solving computer problems. However, 30% had a different opinion and didn't see it as useful. It seems there are varying views on the benefits of Procedural Programming.

Familiarity with Procedural Programming:

We wanted to find out how familiar the participants were with Procedural Programming. The results showed that 40% felt very familiar with it, another 40% said they were somewhat familiar, and only 20% admitted to having no knowledge of it. This suggests that many participants have some level of familiarity with Procedural Programming.

Comparison with Object-oriented Programming:

We also asked the participants if they preferred Procedural Programming or Object-oriented Programming (OOP). Surprisingly, an equal number of participants, 50% each, expressed a preference for one or the other. This suggests that both Procedural Programming and OOP have their merits and are considered useful by the participants.

Rating of the Survey:

Lastly, we wanted to know how the participants rated our survey on a scale of 1 to 10. The average rating was 7, indicating that most participants found the survey to be okay. There is room for improvement in future surveys to make them even better.

Conclusion:

Our survey gave us insights into what people know, think, and prefer regarding Procedural Programming. While some participants were already familiar with it, others had never heard of it before. Opinions on its usefulness were divided, with some seeing its benefits and others being skeptical. Many participants had some level of familiarity with Procedural Programming, indicating a general interest in the topic. The preference between Procedural Programming and OOP was split evenly, showing that both have their strengths. Overall, the survey received an average rating of 7, suggesting room for improvement. These findings help us understand people's perceptions of Procedural Programming and highlight the need for further exploration and understanding of this programming approach.